The HJH Digital PTE. LTD. editorial policy serves as the guiding principle to maintain the integrity, consistency, and quality of all published content associated with our company. It applies to all of the following publications:
- HJH Digital
- Weight of Stuff (weightofstuff.com)
- Dimension of Stuff (dimensionofstuff.com)
- Montessori for Today (montessorifortoday.com)
The HJH Digital editorial team functions autonomously and impartially. Our assessments and rankings for the “best” are derived from established procedures, involving our editorial personnel and, as necessary, seasoned industry experts.
Our content is shaped by comprehensive research, autonomous data collection, thorough analysis, and insights from authorities in the field.
We are committed to the precision of our information and promptly make any needed clarifications or corrections. Our skilled in-house journalists meticulously verify in-depth and investigative pieces. Our publications avoid inflammatory language, sensationalism, distortion, bias, carelessness, and dishonesty.
To preserve our integrity, we forbid all team members and contributors from receiving any benefit or favor from entities they report on. Any potential financial, professional, legal, personal, or other conflicts of interest must be avoided or fully disclosed to and discussed with the relevant senior editor. Approved conflicts are transparently communicated to our readers within the article.
Violating these strict guidelines is considered a grave transgression. Any such breach is subject to immediate examination and disciplinary measures, potentially leading to dismissal from our organization.
In Summary, our editorial policy is the guiding principle to maintain the integrity, consistency, and quality of all published content associated with our company.
- Accuracy: Ensure all published content is precise and fact-checked.
- Transparency: Fully disclose potential conflicts of interest and relationships that may influence content.
- Confidentiality: Strictly adhere to regulations protecting personal or proprietary information.
- Intellectual Property: Respect all intellectual property rights.
- Ethics: Comply with ethical guidelines (more details available here).
- Responsibility: Authors are accountable for the authenticity of their work.
- Review: All content undergoes thorough review and revision for quality assurance. This includes peer review for scientific articles.
- Feedback: Welcome and promptly address reader feedback, suggestions, and complaints.
Our Editorial Process
The editorial process ensures all published content’s consistency, credibility, and accuracy. In compliance with our editorial policy, it consists of the following key steps:
- Content Proposal
A proposal is submitted for content.
- Preliminary Screening
The editors conduct a preliminary review of the proposal, assessing its relevance to our readers, uniqueness, and compliance with our standards.
- Draft Submission
Once approved, authors develop and submit a draft. This document should adhere strictly to factual accuracy, intellectual property rights, writing, and ethical guidelines.
- Fact-checking and Validation
The editorial team verifies the authenticity of the content, checking all the facts presented, and confirming the sources used. We believe in full transparency, therefore, any potential conflicts of interest and relationships that may influence content are disclosed at this stage.
When appropriate, the content undergoes a review process. Experts evaluate the content for its validity.
- Editing and Revisions
Editors review the draft for coherence, language, style, and adherence to our writing guidelines. They recommend revisions if needed, ensuring the content’s quality before it’s approved for publication.
- Author Revision
The authors revise their work based on the editorial feedback, making all necessary adjustments.
- Final Review
The revised draft goes through another round of review to ensure all suggested revisions have been incorporated and meet all the editorial standards.
Once the final draft is approved, it is scheduled for publication.
- Post-publication Review
After publication, we encourage and promptly address feedback and suggestions from our readers. We are dedicated to improving our content continuously, and reader feedback plays a crucial role in this process.
This editorial process guarantees that all our published content is accurate, transparent, ethical, and responsible, resonating with our editorial policy.
Our aim is to provide our readers with high-quality content that they can trust and value.